Abortion is defined as the termination of pregnancy before the age of viability (WHO,2015). It could be spontaneous or induced. An induced abortion is characterized by deliberate interference with pregnancy, with the aim of terminating it.
The Pro-choice group supports the right of any woman to make decisions about her reproductive functions based on her own moral and ethical beliefs. Christianity particularly Catholicism, orthodox Judaism and Islam, are opposed to abortion on the understanding that the fetus is an individual created by God for a purpose. Pope Francis describes abortion as the highest form of thuggery against the defenseless, which leaves the women with emotional turmoil. He stated that “Abortion compounds the grief of many women who now carry with them deep physical and spiritual wounds after succumbing to the pressures of a secular culture which devalues God’s gift of sexuality and the right to life of the unborn”.
Induced abortion is associated with long term psychological consequences both for the healthcare provider and the client, thus the need for "value clarification".
According to Turner, Pearson, George & Andersen (2017), Value clarification is a process in which individuals engage in honest, open-minded and critical reflection and evaluation of new or re-framed information and situations, challenge deeply-held assumptions and myths and discover or potentially transform their values. It entails examining one’s basic moral reasoning to identify the values that one finds most meaningful and important. Healthcare providers utilize value clarification tools to examine factors affecting the health personnel or client decision to have an abortion (National Abortion Federation, 2005).
In personal value clarification, exercises are provided, intended to help the health care provider clarify present personal values about pregnancy options, abortion, and abortion training, and also to help them think about those values in the context of professional judgments called upon to make. The Royal college of nursing (2017), opined that preregistration midwives go through a facilitated value clarification process because they will inevitably encounter clients seeking termination of pregnancy services. Values clarification is, therefore, a valuable tool which can help people refine their value systems in a low-risk environment, as opposed to having to refine one’s value system in a high-risk situations such as when being faced with a moral dilemma in real life choices and behavior.
According to National Abortion Federation (2015), value clarification include examination of:
1. External influences like family and social groups, spiritual beliefs and life stage.
2. Personal or Internal influences e.g personal experiences with sex, Abortion, pregnancy, parenting, Adoption etcetera.
3. Circumstances of decision like Gestational age, individual or societal factors, comfort level with circumstances of decision of each woman’s abortion decision etcetera.
4. Professional Obligations and conflicts.
In client value clarification, it is important for a health care provider to evaluate a client choice along with her in order to provide objective and respectful professional care. Health personnel will begin by looking at the option of abortion and personal responses to issues such as gestational age, and then follow with the circumstances of the individual woman who is making this decision. Client value clarification helps the abortion seeker to understand issues about abortion. After value clarification, client may identify other better alternatives to resolve unwanted pregnancy issues and may decide to keep the pregnancy.
Regarding Conscientious Objection and the provision ofAbortion services or post abortion care, Section 4 of the Abortion Act, 1967 (as amended by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act, 1990) provides a right of conscientious objection (CO) which allows healthcare professionals to decline to participate in a termination of pregnancy. This right is limited only to the active participation in the termination of pregnancy where there is no emergency with regard to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman. Supporting, Delegating and supervising is not covered by CO thus it is recommended that if this is in conflict with the providers moral belief, there is need to find another job. Some countries do not discuss CO in their abortion laws. This has been interpreted to mean that providers lack a legal right to object (Fiala, Danielsson & Keikinheimo, 2016).
In Nigeria abortion is illegal and CO was not discussed in the abortion law. CO cannot be invoked in the provision of post abortion care. Delivery of post-abortion care to professional standards is legitimate, necessary, and does not in itself implicate providers in another’s prior illegality or professional misconduct. Second and third trimester abortion may result to life birth. In the event of the neonate showing signs of life, the neonate should be kept warm and comfortable and offered oral nutrition for both prolife and prochoice advocates. A neonate born alive must be registered as such by law (RCON, 2017)
Regarding Conscientious objections and the use of contraceptives, Increasing numbers of pharmacists, physicians and nurses are refusing to dispense, prescribe or administer these forms of pregnancy prevention, citing moral objections to hormonal contraceptives. The objections are based on the belief that hormonal methods of contraception are abortifacients; that is, that the use of these methods will result in the destruction of a fertilized egg.
In Nigeria, there is no known laws protecting health personnel from prescribing or administering contraceptives on moral or ethical grounds. Decision to provide contraceptive services are based on a framework which focuses on principle-based ethics. This utilizes four principles to objectively analyze a given clinical situation: respect for patient or providers autonomy, beneficence, non maleficence and justice.
By Ijeoma Kelechi-Duruh,
Department of Nursing Sciences University Of Nigeria, Enugu Campus.
Anthonia u. Chiweuba (PhD),
Department of Nursing Sciences University Of Nigeria, Enugu Campus.
The views expressed in this article are the views of the authours and published with their consent. Any questions or enquiries arising from the article can be addressed directly to: Kelechiduruhijeoma@gmail.com





